Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.74
Change-$0.41 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$26.59
Change-$0.43 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a StrongBuy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 20.2B vs. MNHRX (475M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.81) vs MNHRX (0.52). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (14 years) vs RGSFX (9 years). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.18 vs. MNHRX (18.75). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.32 vs. MNHRX (10.28).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.353 | 19.345 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 475M | 20.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.75 | 28.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.09 | -5.02 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.28 | 39.32 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers