Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.95
Change-$0.28 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$24.64
Change-$0.49 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 18.6B vs. MNHRX (469M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.81) vs MNHRX (0.52). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (14 years) vs RGSFX (9 years). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.55 vs. MNHRX (17.83). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.96 vs. MNHRX (10.14).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.546 | 12.792 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 469M | 18.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 21.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.64 | -6.78 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.14 | 37.96 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers