Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.78
Change-$0.34 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.98M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$26.03
Change-$0.53 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. MNHRX (471M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.81) vs MNHRX (0.52). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RGSFX (9 years). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. MNHRX (5.93). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.94 vs. MNHRX (7.69).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.832 | 2.764 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 471M | 21.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 10.43 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.53 | 15.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.69 | 34.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...