Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.15
Change-$0.70 (-2.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$26.98
Change-$0.92 (-3.30%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a StrongBuy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 21.2B vs. MNHRX (480M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.81) vs MNHRX (0.52). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (14 years) vs RGSFX (9 years). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. MNHRX (10.67). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.57 vs. MNHRX (12.66).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.461 | 25.224 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 21.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.67 | 25.67 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.01 | 6.54 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.66 | 40.57 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...