Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. MNHRX (400M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.49) vs MNHRX (0.38). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). MNHRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. MNHRX (0.22). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.64 vs. MNHRX (-12.23).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.51 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.51 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.314 | 9.248 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 400M | 28.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.22 | 12.85 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.56 | 51.94 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.23 | 24.64 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.11 | 113.98 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement