Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGSFX
MNHRX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGSFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. MNHRX (396M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGSFX (0.50) vs MNHRX (0.37). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). MNHRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. MNHRX (1.55). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.79 vs. MNHRX (-11.47).
| MNHRX | RGSFX | MNHRX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.51 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.51 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.341 | 8.590 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 28.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.50 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 11.33 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.49 | 49.47 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.47 | 22.79 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.59 | 112.41 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement