Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGWFX
MNHRX vs RGWFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWFX
MNHRX vs RGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. MNHRX (391M). RGWFX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: RGWFX (0.54) vs MNHRX (0.37). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWFX: MNHRX (16 years) vs RGWFX (14 years). MNHRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGWFX (0.43). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGWFX (1.00). RGWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWFX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. MNHRX (-0.55). RGWFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.85 vs. MNHRX (-11.98).
| MNHRX | RGWFX | MNHRX / RGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.43 | 305% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.43 | 305% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.973 | 10.361 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 391M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.54 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 8.03 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.05 | 57.06 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.98 | 21.85 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.27 | 117.16 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement