Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHWX vs RGSFX
MNHWX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHWX vs RGSFX
MNHWX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHWX vs. RGSFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHWX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. MNHWX (390M). MNHWX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: MNHWX (1.83) vs RGSFX (0.49). MNHWX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHWX (7 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). MNHWX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). MNHWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). MNHWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSFX: MNHWX (0) vs RGSFX (250). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. MNHWX (0.24). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.05 vs. MNHWX (-1.89).
| MNHWX | RGSFX | MNHWX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.51 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.51 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | 10.322 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 390M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.49 | 373% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | 7.89 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.08 | 56.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.89 | 21.05 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement