MNSB
Price
$16.80
Change
-$0.56 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
136.83M
81 days until earnings call
UCB
Price
$33.05
Change
+$0.15 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MNSB vs UCB

Header iconMNSB vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts MNSB vs UCBBanner chart's image
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$16.80
Change-$0.56 (-3.23%)
Volume$116
Capitalization136.83M
United Community Banks
Price$33.05
Change+$0.15 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization3.13B
MNSB vs UCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSB vs. UCB commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSB is a StrongBuy and UCB is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (MNSB: $16.96 vs. UCB: $33.05)
Brand notoriety: MNSB and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSB: 158% vs. UCB: 149%
Market capitalization -- MNSB: $136.83M vs. UCB: $3.13B
MNSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $136.83M. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSB is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSB’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSB’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the short-term than MNSB.

Price Growth

MNSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($3.13B) has a higher market cap than MNSB($137M). UCB has higher P/E ratio than MNSB: UCB (16.42) vs MNSB (5.53). UCB YTD gains are higher at: 2.290 vs. MNSB (-6.298). MNSB has less debt than UCB: MNSB (72.6M) vs UCB (325M). UCB has higher revenues than MNSB: UCB (872M) vs MNSB (79.6M).
MNSBUCBMNSB / UCB
Capitalization137M3.13B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.2982.290-275%
P/E Ratio5.5316.4234%
Revenue79.6M872M9%
Total CashN/A201M-
Total Debt72.6M325M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNSB vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
MNSB
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
5111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNSB's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (77). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (100). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (51). This means that UCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (57). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCB (71). This means that MNSB’s stock grew significantly faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSBUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGGFX22.130.33
+1.51%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth I
FIFAX25.270.15
+0.60%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F3
SWFCX13.22N/A
N/A
Touchstone International Value C
CCGIX24.50N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
FIKIX44.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with PPBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then PPBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
-2.30%
PPBI - MNSB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
SBCF - MNSB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
ABCB - MNSB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
UCB - MNSB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
EGBN - MNSB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+0.46%
UBSI - UCB
92%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
FFBC - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
ABCB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
FCF - UCB
90%
Closely correlated
+3.34%
WSFS - UCB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More