MNTN
Price
$21.27
Change
-$0.71 (-3.23%)
Updated
Aug 15, 01:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.6B
SLAMF
Price
$11.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
166.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNTN vs SLAMF

Header iconMNTN vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts MNTN vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
MNTN
Price$21.27
Change-$0.71 (-3.23%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization1.6B
Slam
Price$11.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$175
Capitalization166.83M
MNTN vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNTN vs. SLAMF commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNTN is a Hold and SLAMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MNTN: $21.98 vs. SLAMF: $11.57)
Brand notoriety: MNTN and SLAMF are both not notable
MNTN represents the Packaged Software, while SLAMF is part of the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNTN: 76% vs. SLAMF: 4%
Market capitalization -- MNTN: $1.6B vs. SLAMF: $166.83M
MNTN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.6B. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $325.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $191.39M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNTN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNTN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNTN and SLAMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLAMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

MNTN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.01% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.19%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +4.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Financial Conglomerates (+4.97% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNTN($1.6B) has a higher market cap than SLAMF($167M). SLAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.97M vs. MNTN (-23.06M). MNTN has more cash in the bank: 82.3M vs. SLAMF (66). SLAMF has less debt than MNTN: SLAMF (14.5M) vs MNTN (51.3M). MNTN has higher revenues than SLAMF: MNTN (246M) vs SLAMF (0).
MNTNSLAMFMNTN / SLAMF
Capitalization1.6B167M956%
EBITDA-23.06M-1.97M1,168%
Gain YTDN/A1.938-
P/E RatioN/A144.63-
Revenue246M0-
Total Cash82.3M66124,696,970%
Total Debt51.3M14.5M354%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWACX24.39N/A
N/A
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy C
JCNIX29.42N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian S
RYHRX40.44N/A
N/A
Rydex Real Estate H
GCSSX26.69N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Svc
GMVRX16.57N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R

MNTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNTN has been loosely correlated with EONR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNTN jumps, then EONR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTN
1D Price
Change %
MNTN100%
-4.77%
EONR - MNTN
37%
Loosely correlated
+6.92%
SLAMF - MNTN
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DMYY - MNTN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
ASCBF - MNTN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMV - MNTN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More