The Mosaic Company (MOS) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN) operate in the fertilizer sector, producing essential crop nutrients amid volatile commodity prices and global agricultural demand. MOS focuses on phosphate and potash, while UAN specializes in nitrogen products like urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning, aiding traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing dividends or sector exposure. With fertilizer prices influenced by supply constraints and weather patterns, understanding relative strengths helps navigate current market conditions.
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is a leading producer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients, operating mines and facilities across Phosphates, Potash, and Mosaic Fertilizantes segments. In recent market activity, MOS shares have fallen about 13% over the past month and 8% year-to-date, trading around $22 near 52-week lows of $22.17 (versus highs of $38.23). This reflects cautious sentiment ahead of Q1 earnings, with EPS forecasts cut 10% to $0.20 (down 59% year-over-year) due to U.S. phosphate demand softness, elevated sulfur costs, and production adjustments. Broader pressures include input inflation, though global fundamentals remain solid with expected 7 million tons phosphate output in 2026. Market cap stands at $7B, P/E at 13, beta ~0.8, and dividend yield ~4%.
CVR Partners, LP (UAN), a Delaware MLP, manufactures nitrogen fertilizers including ammonia and UAN at facilities in Coffeyville, Kansas, and East Dubuque, Illinois, using pet coke gasification. Recent weeks show resilience, with shares around $126 (52-week range $80-$139.50), up 23% year-to-date and 54-71% over the past year despite a 6% five-day dip. Q1 2026 delivered $50 million net income ($4.72 per unit), $78 million EBITDA, and $180 million sales, boosted by high ammonia utilization (103%) and favorable pricing amid supply tightness. Full-year 2025 EBITDA reached $211 million. As a smaller-cap entity ($1.3B market cap), it trades at P/E 11, beta 0.3-0.6 (lower volatility), and yields over 9% via variable distributions.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. It features 25 elite bots out of 351 total, curated for current market conditions using advanced Financial Learning Models. These bots deliver impressive stats like annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, targeting areas such as semiconductors, industrials, leveraged ETFs, space, data centers, and gold miners. Each employs unique approaches like momentum, sector rotation, or volatility trading on stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Traders can explore these for copy trading insights tailored to today's environment. Visit Trending AI Robots to review performance and suit your strategy.
MOS and UAN share fertilizer sector exposure but differ in focus: MOS's diversified phosphate/potash model supports scale ($12B revenue) and global reach, while UAN's nitrogen purity enables high margins amid supply shortages. Growth drivers contrast—MOS eyes production ramps and cost cuts, UAN leverages pricing power. Recent momentum favors UAN (YTD +23% vs. -8%), with lower beta signaling less risk. MOS carries higher debt but stable dividends; UAN's MLP structure yields tax-advantaged payouts. Sentiment tilts positive for nitrogen on tight markets, versus phosphate headwinds, though both face commodity cycles.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors UAN over MOS, driven by superior trend consistency, YTD stability, recent earnings strength, and lower volatility in fertilizer market positioning. Observable catalysts like nitrogen pricing and high distributions enhance probabilistic edge, though MOS could rebound post-earnings on volume recovery.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MOS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while UAN (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.53%.
MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
UAN is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| MOS | UAN | MOS / UAN | |
| Capitalization | 7.16B | 1.17B | 609% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | 236M | 844% |
| Gain YTD | -8.280 | 12.284 | -67% |
| P/E Ratio | 160.79 | 9.66 | 1,664% |
| Revenue | 12.4B | 643M | 1,928% |
| Total Cash | 282M | 128M | 220% |
| Total Debt | 5.76B | 575M | 1,002% |
MOS | UAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UAN's Valuation (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as MOS (16). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (100). This means that UAN’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's SMR Rating (24) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (91). This means that UAN’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as MOS (62). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.
MOS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for UAN (74). This means that MOS’s stock grew significantly faster than UAN’s over the last 12 months.
| MOS | UAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 27 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAN has been loosely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAN jumps, then CF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAN | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| CF - UAN | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| IPI - UAN | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.66% | ||
| NTR - UAN | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| RKDA - UAN | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
| CTVA - UAN | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||