MPNGF
Price
$18.71
Change
-$1.69 (-8.28%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
87 days until earnings call
RDBBF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

MPNGF vs RDBBF

Header iconMPNGF vs RDBBF Comparison
Open Charts MPNGF vs RDBBFBanner chart's image
MEITUAN
Price$18.71
Change-$1.69 (-8.28%)
Volume$13.88K
CapitalizationN/A
ARTICORE GROUP
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$3.57K
CapitalizationN/A
MPNGF vs RDBBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPNGF vs. RDBBF commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPNGF is a Hold and RDBBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (MPNGF: $18.71 vs. RDBBF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: MPNGF and RDBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPNGF: 55% vs. RDBBF: 23%
Market capitalization -- MPNGF: $121.08B vs. RDBBF: $50.1M
MPNGF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $121.08B. RDBBF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $50.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.37T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $41.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPNGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDBBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MPNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDBBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPNGF is a better buy in the long-term than RDBBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPNGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDBBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPNGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RDBBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDBBF is a better buy in the short-term than MPNGF.

Price Growth

MPNGF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -8.01% price change this week, while RDBBF (@Internet Retail) price change was +4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPNGF is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+3.21% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPNGF($121B) has a higher market cap than RDBBF($48.4M). MPNGF YTD gains are higher at: 81.035 vs. RDBBF (-62.741).
MPNGFRDBBFMPNGF / RDBBF
Capitalization121B48.4M250,000%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD81.035-62.741-129%
P/E Ratio40.48N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPNGF vs RDBBF: Fundamental Ratings
MPNGF
RDBBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6394
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
8898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3990
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDBBF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MPNGF (79). This means that RDBBF’s stock grew similarly to MPNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MPNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as RDBBF (100). This means that MPNGF’s stock grew similarly to RDBBF’s over the last 12 months.

MPNGF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as RDBBF (98). This means that MPNGF’s stock grew similarly to RDBBF’s over the last 12 months.

MPNGF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDBBF (90). This means that MPNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDBBF’s over the last 12 months.

MPNGF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as RDBBF (97). This means that MPNGF’s stock grew similarly to RDBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPNGFRDBBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTQI21.100.15
+0.72%
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
FLSW32.220.20
+0.63%
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
IBMR24.89-0.02
-0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
EVMT14.62-0.01
-0.08%
Invesco Elctc vhcl Mtls Cmd StgyNoK-1ETF
TFI45.50-0.04
-0.09%
SPDR® Nuveen Blmbg Muni Bd ETF

MPNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPNGF has been closely correlated with MPNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPNGF jumps, then MPNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPNGF
1D Price
Change %
MPNGF100%
-8.28%
MPNGY - MPNGF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
BABA - MPNGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
BZUN - MPNGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
JD - MPNGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
BABAF - MPNGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+14.29%
More

RDBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDBBF and MPNGF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDBBF and MPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDBBF
1D Price
Change %
RDBBF100%
N/A
MPNGF - RDBBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.28%
MCARY - RDBBF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXHI - RDBBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPNGY - RDBBF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
KGGNF - RDBBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More