MQ
Price
$4.76
Change
+$0.06 (+1.28%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PAGS
Price
$8.75
Change
-$0.10 (-1.13%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MQ vs PAGS

Header iconMQ vs PAGS Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs PAGSBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$4.76
Change+$0.06 (+1.28%)
Volume$3.24M
Capitalization2.14B
PagSeguro Digital
Price$8.75
Change-$0.10 (-1.13%)
Volume$5.63M
Capitalization2.55B
MQ vs PAGS Comparison Chart in %
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. PAGS commentary
Oct 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and PAGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MQ: $4.76 vs. PAGS: $8.75)
Brand notoriety: MQ and PAGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 90% vs. PAGS: 118%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $2.14B vs. PAGS: $2.55B
MQ [@Computer Communications] is valued at $2.14B. PAGS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAGS is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the short-term than PAGS.

Price Growth

MQ (@Computer Communications) experienced а -5.27% price change this week, while PAGS (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

PAGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.91% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAGS($2.55B) has a higher market cap than MQ($2.14B). MQ has higher P/E ratio than PAGS: MQ (56.80) vs PAGS (6.85). PAGS YTD gains are higher at: 45.908 vs. MQ (25.726). PAGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.44B vs. MQ (-85.47M). PAGS has higher revenues than MQ: PAGS (19.3B) vs MQ (553M).
MQPAGSMQ / PAGS
Capitalization2.14B2.55B84%
EBITDA-85.47M8.44B-1%
Gain YTD25.72645.90856%
P/E Ratio56.806.85830%
Revenue553M19.3B3%
Total Cash822MN/A-
Total Debt14.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGS: Fundamental Ratings
PAGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQPAGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGICX44.800.02
+0.04%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc C
AEDCX32.64N/A
N/A
Invesco International Value C
BUFOX17.32N/A
N/A
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
VGWAX34.38N/A
N/A
Vanguard Global Wellington Admiral
TAGBX2.79N/A
N/A
Templeton Global Dynamic Income A

PAGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGS
1D Price
Change %
PAGS100%
-1.13%
STNE - PAGS
81%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
COIN - PAGS
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.33%
CLSK - PAGS
46%
Loosely correlated
+9.63%
COMP - PAGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.90%
RIOT - PAGS
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
More