MQ
Price
$5.07
Change
-$0.13 (-2.50%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
74 days until earnings call
TRUG
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.03 (+15.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.97M
102 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MQ vs TRUG

Header iconMQ vs TRUG Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs TRUGBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$5.07
Change-$0.13 (-2.50%)
Volume$12.4M
Capitalization3.06B
TruGolf Holdings
Price$0.23
Change+$0.03 (+15.00%)
Volume$13.12M
Capitalization16.97M
MQ vs TRUG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. TRUG commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MQ: $5.07 vs. TRUG: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: MQ and TRUG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 160% vs. TRUG: 923%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $3.06B vs. TRUG: $16.97M
MQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.06B. TRUG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $16.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the long-term than TRUG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the short-term than TRUG.

Price Growth

MQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while TRUG (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

TRUG is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.06B) has a higher market cap than TRUG($17M). MQ YTD gains are higher at: 33.773 vs. TRUG (-65.013). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. TRUG (178K). TRUG has less debt than MQ: TRUG (2.15M) vs MQ (16.9M).
MQTRUGMQ / TRUG
Capitalization3.06B17M18,012%
EBITDA-272.27MN/A-
Gain YTD33.773-65.013-52%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue676MN/A-
Total Cash1.25B178K702,247%
Total Debt16.9M2.15M786%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQTRUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEFOX59.60N/A
N/A
Meehan Focus
FETKX28.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Equity Dividend Income K
MXBUX8.71N/A
N/A
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index L
FSYJX9.64N/A
N/A
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Eq
CECYX26.81-0.20
-0.74%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst3

TRUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with CALX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then CALX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUG
1D Price
Change %
TRUG100%
+15.15%
CALX - TRUG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
MARK - TRUG
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
DASTY - TRUG
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
KGDEF - TRUG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQ - TRUG
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More