MQ
Price
$16.43
Change
+$0.56 (+3.53%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRUG
Price
$1.22
Change
-$0.07 (-5.43%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.37M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MQ vs TRUG

MQ vs TRUG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. TRUG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and TRUG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MQ: $16.43 vs. TRUG: $1.22)
Brand notoriety: MQ and TRUG are both not notable
MQ represents the Computer Communications, while TRUG is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 79% vs. TRUG: 34%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $1.73B vs. TRUG: $1.37M
MQ [@Computer Communications] is valued at $1.73B. TRUG’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.47B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the long-term than TRUG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRUG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the short-term than TRUG.

Price Growth

MQ (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while TRUG (@Recreational Products) price change was -19.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

TRUG is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-4.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Recreational Products (-3.16% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($1.73B) has a higher market cap than TRUG($1.37M). MQ YTD gains are higher at: -13.526 vs. TRUG (-83.172). MQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.89M vs. TRUG (-10.11M). TRUG has less debt than MQ: TRUG (4.18M) vs MQ (15.1M). MQ has higher revenues than TRUG: MQ (652M) vs TRUG (18.7M).
MQTRUGMQ / TRUG
Capitalization1.73B1.37M126,131%
EBITDA4.89M-10.11M-48%
Gain YTD-13.526-83.17216%
P/E Ratio410.75N/A-
Revenue652M18.7M3,487%
Total CashN/A8.84M-
Total Debt15.1M4.18M361%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQTRUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRUG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTOH8.440.02
+0.24%
Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF
XMPT22.090.01
+0.05%
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
IGRO89.07-0.28
-0.32%
iShares International Dividend Gr ETF
EFO71.88-1.41
-1.93%
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
HOOW30.72-0.75
-2.38%
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
+3.53%
COIN - MQ
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CLSK - MQ
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
ACIW - MQ
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
COMP - MQ
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
RIOT - MQ
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
More