Advertisement
MQ vs TRUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRUG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TRUG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MQ (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while TRUG (@Recreational Products) price change was -11.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
MQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
TRUG is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.71% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Recreational Products (-0.06% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| MQ | TRUG | MQ / TRUG | |
| Capitalization | 1.7B | 1.64M | 103,589% |
| EBITDA | 4.89M | -10.11M | -48% |
| Gain YTD | -13.895 | -88.211 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 181.78 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 652M | 18.7M | 3,487% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 8.84M | - |
| Total Debt | 15.1M | 4.18M | 361% |
| MQ | TRUG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 23% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
Advertisement
MQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
TRUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with PEGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then PEGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | 100% | -10.97% | ||
| PEGA - TRUG | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CALX - TRUG | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| VERI - TRUG | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MQ - TRUG | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.54% | ||
| ADEA - TRUG | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
More | ||||