Ad is loading...
MRCLX vs PACAX
MRCLX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCLX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation Admin
Price$8.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.34M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.17M
MRCLX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCLX vs. PACAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCLX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. MRCLX (172M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MRCLX: PACAX (3.51) vs MRCLX (3.18). MRCLX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCLX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than MRCLX (0.87). MRCLX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. PACAX (4.57). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.96 vs. MRCLX (7.49).
| MRCLX | PACAX | MRCLX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.113 | -1.631 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 553M | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.51 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 4.57 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.82 | 4.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | 7.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.12 | 13.25 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers