Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRCVX vs PACAX
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCVX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation R3
Price$9.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.07M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.86M
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCVX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCVX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 571M vs. MRCVX (179M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MRCVX: PACAX (3.66) vs MRCVX (2.79). MRCVX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCVX (11 years) vs PACAX (32 years). MRCVX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MRCVX (16.00). MRCVX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. MRCVX (6.48). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.66 vs. MRCVX (2.49).
| MRCVX | PACAX | MRCVX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.396 | 6.173 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 571M | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 3.66 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 7.62 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.23 | 16.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.49 | 8.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.27 | 23.38 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement