Ad is loading...
MRCVX vs PACAX
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCVX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation R3
Price$8.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.34M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.17M
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCVX vs. PACAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCVX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. MRCVX (172M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MRCVX: PACAX (3.51) vs MRCVX (2.86). MRCVX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCVX (11 years) vs PACAX (31 years). MRCVX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). MRCVX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. PACAX (4.57). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.96 vs. MRCVX (5.28).
| MRCVX | PACAX | MRCVX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.631 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 553M | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 3.51 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 4.57 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.55 | 4.64 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.28 | 7.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.27 | 13.25 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers