Ad is loading...
MRCVX vs PACAX
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCVX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation R3
Price$9.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCVX vs. PACAX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCVX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 576M vs. MRCVX (183M). MRCVX pays higher dividends than PACAX: MRCVX (2.80) vs PACAX (2.18). MRCVX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCVX (11 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 456.00 vs. MRCVX (27.00). MRCVX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. MRCVX (10.97). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.40 vs. MRCVX (1.21).
| MRCVX | PACAX | MRCVX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.398 | 10.123 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 576M | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.18 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 16.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.24 | -2.74 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.21 | 11.40 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.78 | 15.39 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers