Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRCVX vs PACAX
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCVX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation R3
Price$9.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.4M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets571.3M
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCVX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCVX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 571M vs. MRCVX (165M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MRCVX: PACAX (3.40) vs MRCVX (2.75). MRCVX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCVX (11 years) vs PACAX (32 years). MRCVX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MRCVX (16.00). MRCVX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. MRCVX (4.59). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. MRCVX (2.75).
| MRCVX | PACAX | MRCVX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.867 | 6.654 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 571M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 3.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 5.03 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 20.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.75 | 9.30 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.22 | 27.64 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement