Ad is loading...
MRCVX vs PACAX
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MRCVX vs PACAX
MassMutual 20/80 Allocation R3
Price$8.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.82M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.94M
MRCVX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCVX vs. PACAX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCVX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 585M vs. MRCVX (180M). MRCVX pays higher dividends than PACAX: MRCVX (2.80) vs PACAX (2.18). MRCVX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MRCVX (11 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 456.00 vs. MRCVX (27.00). MRCVX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. MRCVX (6.57). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.20 vs. MRCVX (2.43).
| MRCVX | PACAX | MRCVX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.755 | 2.488 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 585M | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.18 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | 7.61 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.93 | 5.52 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | 9.20 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.37 | 20.08 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...