Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRGCX vs RWMFX
MRGCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts MRGCX vs RWMFX
MRGCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRGCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRGCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MRGCX (6.35B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than MRGCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs MRGCX (0.00). MRGCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: MRGCX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). MRGCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). MRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRGCX: RWMFX (250) vs MRGCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. MRGCX (0.78). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. MRGCX (5.38).
| MRGCX | RWMFX | MRGCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.31 | 526% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.31 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.537 | 1.322 | 494% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.78 | 7.03 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.60 | 30.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.38 | 26.38 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.76 | 82.33 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement