Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRLTX vs RGEBX
MRLTX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MRLTX vs RGEBX
MRLTX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRLTX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRLTX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MRLTX (118M). MRLTX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MRLTX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MRLTX (17 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). MRLTX (1.11) and RGEBX (1.08) have similar cost to investors . MRLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRLTX: RGEBX (250) vs MRLTX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.95 vs. MRLTX (-13.18). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.39 vs. MRLTX (-4.40).
| MRLTX | RGEBX | MRLTX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.08 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.08 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.994 | 8.453 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.18 | -1.95 | 677% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.14 | 41.17 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | 9.39 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 95.51 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement