MRT
Price
$2.41
Change
+$0.02 (+0.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
189.92M
PLGGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRT vs PLGGF

Header iconMRT vs PLGGF Comparison
Open Charts MRT vs PLGGFBanner chart's image
Marti Technologies
Price$2.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.84%)
Volume$13.79K
Capitalization189.92M
ENERGY PLUG TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$20.3K
Capitalization8.95M
MRT vs PLGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRT vs. PLGGF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRT is a Hold and PLGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MRT: $2.41 vs. PLGGF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: MRT and PLGGF are both not notable
MRT represents the Packaged Software, while PLGGF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRT: 18% vs. PLGGF: 62%
Market capitalization -- MRT: $189.92M vs. PLGGF: $8.95M
MRT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $189.92M. PLGGF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $8.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLGGF is a better buy in the long-term than MRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLGGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the short-term than PLGGF.

Price Growth

MRT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while PLGGF (@Computer Communications) price change was -13.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRT($190M) has a higher market cap than PLGGF($8.95M). MRT YTD gains are higher at: -28.820 vs. PLGGF (-33.043).
MRTPLGGFMRT / PLGGF
Capitalization190M8.95M2,124%
EBITDAN/A-2.06M-
Gain YTD-28.820-33.04387%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.47M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRT vs PLGGF: Fundamental Ratings
MRT
PLGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4213

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLGGF (48) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

PLGGF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PLGGF’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

PLGGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PLGGF’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRTPLGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SABS2.270.01
+0.44%
SAB Biotherapeutics
PSX131.55-0.03
-0.02%
Phillips 66
WTM1796.03-4.48
-0.25%
White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd
NESR9.53-0.18
-1.85%
National Energy Services Reunited Corp
STIM3.23-0.08
-2.42%
Neuronetics

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and APPS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and APPS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
+0.84%
APPS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
CSGS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
HCAT - MRT
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
UBER - MRT
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
SAP - MRT
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

PLGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGGF and RDVT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGGF and RDVT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLGGF
1D Price
Change %
PLGGF100%
-15.38%
RDVT - PLGGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
HCAT - PLGGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
APPS - PLGGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
KVYO - PLGGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
MRT - PLGGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More