Advertisement
MRT vs UBER
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRT is a Hold and UBER is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBER’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UBER’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBER’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UBER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MRT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while UBER (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
UBER is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MRT | UBER | MRT / UBER | |
| Capitalization | 190M | 190B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 7.76B | - |
| Gain YTD | -28.820 | 50.845 | -57% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.50 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 47.3B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 7.37B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 12.3B | - |
MRT | UBER | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for UBER (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew significantly faster than UBER’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that UBER’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's SMR Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that UBER’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that UBER’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that UBER’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.
| MRT | UBER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 16 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IQDG | 39.00 | 0.26 | +0.67% |
| WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF | |||
| FHYS | 23.28 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Federated Hermes Short Duration HY ETF | |||
| FCTE | 26.07 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF | |||
| IWV | 369.04 | -0.55 | -0.15% |
| iShares Russell 3000 ETF | |||
| FFOG | 45.80 | -0.07 | -0.15% |
| Franklin Focused Growth ETF | |||
MRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and APPS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and APPS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| APPS - MRT | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.19% | ||
| CSGS - MRT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| HCAT - MRT | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.42% | ||
| UBER - MRT | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| SAP - MRT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||
UBER and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBER has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBER jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBER | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| COIN - UBER | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| CLSK - UBER | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| RIOT - UBER | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| LYFT - UBER | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SNPS - UBER | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||