MS
Price
$137.87
Change
+$2.06 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
153.98B
83 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$113.88
Change
+$2.04 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs SF

Header iconMS vs SF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$137.87
Change+$2.06 (+1.52%)
Volume$12.48M
Capitalization153.98B
Stifel Financial
Price$113.88
Change+$2.04 (+1.82%)
Volume$746.52K
Capitalization7.95B
MS vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. SF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and SF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $137.87 vs. SF: $113.88)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. SF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 187% vs. SF: 121%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. SF: $7.95B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MS and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.68% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +9.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). SF (18.06) and MS (18.06) have similar P/E ratio . MS YTD gains are higher at: 9.664 vs. SF (7.353). SF has less debt than MS: SF (1.18B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than SF: MS (50.7B) vs SF (4.29B).
MSSFMS / SF
Capitalization154B7.95B1,938%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.6647.353131%
P/E Ratio18.0618.06100%
Revenue50.7B4.29B1,182%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt276B1.18B23,469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2624
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (95). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (8). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (11). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (40). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (49). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SURI15.930.23
+1.49%
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
VPL71.180.28
+0.39%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
DWAS92.060.30
+0.33%
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momt ETF
UPW77.530.23
+0.30%
ProShares Ultra Utilities
BYLD22.250.02
+0.09%
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF