MS
Price
$107.93
Change
-$11.34 (-9.51%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
153.98B
7 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$86.01
Change
-$10.49 (-10.87%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs SF

Header iconMS vs SF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$107.93
Change-$11.34 (-9.51%)
Volume$15.19M
Capitalization153.98B
Stifel Financial
Price$86.01
Change-$10.49 (-10.87%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization7.95B
MS vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. SF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $107.93 vs. SF: $86.01)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. SF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 213% vs. SF: 173%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. SF: $7.95B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than MS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.30% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -11.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). SF (18.06) and MS (18.06) have similar P/E ratio . MS YTD gains are higher at: -13.579 vs. SF (-18.567). SF has less debt than MS: SF (1.18B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than SF: MS (50.7B) vs SF (4.29B).
MSSFMS / SF
Capitalization154B7.95B1,938%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.579-18.56773%
P/E Ratio18.0618.06100%
Revenue50.7B4.29B1,182%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt276B1.18B23,469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1115
SMR RATING
1..100
511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7372
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (100). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (15). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (11). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (56). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (73). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGL96.28-0.54
-0.56%
Arch Capital Group Ltd
MAG15.17-0.30
-1.94%
MAG Silver Corp
NOTV2.76-0.11
-3.83%
Inotiv
FUL54.34-3.70
-6.37%
HB Fuller Company
MIGI0.42-0.07
-14.34%
Mawson Infrastructure Group

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-9.51%
GS - MS
86%
Closely correlated
-9.21%
SF - MS
77%
Closely correlated
-10.87%
EVR - MS
76%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
PIPR - MS
75%
Closely correlated
-11.17%
JEF - MS
73%
Closely correlated
-13.04%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-10.87%
GS - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-9.21%
EVR - SF
83%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
RJF - SF
81%
Closely correlated
-8.18%
MS - SF
80%
Closely correlated
-9.51%
PIPR - SF
80%
Closely correlated
-11.17%
More