Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSACX vs VTMGX
MSACX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts MSACX vs VTMGX
MSACX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSACX vs. VTMGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSACX is a Buy and VTMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. MSACX (202M). VTMGX pays higher dividends than MSACX: VTMGX (2.54) vs MSACX (1.37). MSACX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: MSACX (35 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). MSACX (1.11) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). MSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). VTMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSACX: VTMGX (3000) vs MSACX (1000000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.22 vs. MSACX (16.37). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. MSACX (17.81).
| MSACX | VTMGX | MSACX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.05 | 1,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.05 | 2,220% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.641 | 17.961 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 315B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.54 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.37 | 26.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.63 | 65.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.81 | 43.09 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.70 | 107.63 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers