MSB
Price
$31.20
Change
-$0.24 (-0.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
409.34M
SMSMY
Price
$9.17
Change
+$0.11 (+1.21%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSB vs SMSMY

Header iconMSB vs SMSMY Comparison
Open Charts MSB vs SMSMYBanner chart's image
Mesabi Trust
Price$31.20
Change-$0.24 (-0.76%)
Volume$14.84K
Capitalization409.34M
Sims
Price$9.17
Change+$0.11 (+1.21%)
Volume$1.61K
Capitalization1.76B
MSB vs SMSMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSB vs. SMSMY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSB is a Hold and SMSMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MSB: $31.20 vs. SMSMY: $9.17)
Brand notoriety: MSB and SMSMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSB: 31% vs. SMSMY: 111%
Market capitalization -- MSB: $409.34M vs. SMSMY: $1.76B
MSB [@Steel] is valued at $409.34M. SMSMY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMSMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSB is a better buy in the long-term than SMSMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMSMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMSMY is a better buy in the short-term than MSB.

Price Growth

MSB (@Steel) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while SMSMY (@Steel) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +4.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+4.11% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMSMY($1.76B) has a higher market cap than MSB($409M). SMSMY has higher P/E ratio than MSB: SMSMY (1167.72) vs MSB (4.42). MSB YTD gains are higher at: 37.884 vs. SMSMY (25.388). SMSMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. MSB (19M). SMSMY has higher revenues than MSB: SMSMY (6.73B) vs MSB (23.8M).
MSBSMSMYMSB / SMSMY
Capitalization409M1.76B23%
EBITDA19M296M6%
Gain YTD37.88425.388149%
P/E Ratio4.421167.720%
Revenue23.8M6.73B0%
Total Cash13.5MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSB vs SMSMY: Fundamental Ratings
MSB
SMSMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2769
SMR RATING
1..100
894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSB's Valuation (7) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMSMY (96) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew significantly faster than SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMSMY (69) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's SMR Rating (8) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMSMY (94) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew significantly faster than SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SMSMY (63) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

SMSMY's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSB (96) in the Steel industry. This means that SMSMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSBSMSMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCEMX15.74N/A
N/A
PACE International Em Mkts Eq P
MIOFX30.29N/A
N/A
Marsico International Opportunities
AZNCX9.85N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth C
UIVAX20.35N/A
N/A
Victory Value Institutional
QDVSX19.29N/A
N/A
FI Instl ESG Stck Fd for Ret Plns

SMSMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSMY and MSB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSMY and MSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSMY
1D Price
Change %
SMSMY100%
+1.26%
MSB - SMSMY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
CMC - SMSMY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
SID - SMSMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
ANIOY - SMSMY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLF - SMSMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.27%
More