Ad is loading...
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$24.81
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.24M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$99.26
Change+$0.85 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. MSCFX (235M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.39) vs MSCFX (0.09). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.05 vs. NAESX (12.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. MSCFX (-13.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.71 vs. MSCFX (26.01).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.491 | -14.464 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.39 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.98 | -2.42 | 578% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.62 | 0.49 | -3,210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | 66.71 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.22 | 73.20 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...