Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$28.57
Change-$0.48 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.38M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.32
Change+$0.75 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MSCFX (235M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.28) vs MSCFX (0.08). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.41 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.40 vs. MSCFX (-7.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 61.97 vs. MSCFX (28.56).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.158 | -0.351 | 1,471% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.28 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | 2.40 | -299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.15 | 34.84 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 61.97 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.84 | 103.02 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement