Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$27.27
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.64M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MSCFX (246M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.35) vs MSCFX (0.09). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.41 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. MSCFX (-6.88). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. MSCFX (14.36).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.317 | -3.929 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.35 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.88 | 4.88 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.55 | 18.26 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.36 | 52.45 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.17 | 95.90 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement