Ad is loading...
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$26.80
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. MSCFX (248M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.43) vs MSCFX (0.09). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.41 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. MSCFX (-11.75). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.63 vs. MSCFX (28.69).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.504 | -6.997 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.43 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.75 | 0.34 | -3,409% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.39 | 22.70 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.69 | 67.63 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.41 | 91.04 | 36% |