Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$30.36
Change-$0.23 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.92M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$120.12
Change-$0.18 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. MSCFX (243M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.20) vs MSCFX (0.08). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.41 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. MSCFX (0.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.69 vs. MSCFX (30.68).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.131 | 4.633 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.20 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | 10.78 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.16 | 35.87 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.68 | 63.69 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.37 | 133.59 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement