MSCI
Price
$613.58
Change
-$16.69 (-2.65%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.87B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAI
Price
$1.99
Change
-$0.02 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSCI vs WAI

Header iconMSCI vs WAI Comparison
Open Charts MSCI vs WAIBanner chart's image
MSCI vs WAI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCI vs. WAI commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a Buy and WAI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MSCI: $630.27 vs. WAI: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: MSCI and WAI are both not notable
MSCI represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while WAI is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCI: 133% vs. WAI: 4%
Market capitalization -- MSCI: $46.87B vs. WAI: $4.74M
MSCI [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $46.87B. WAI’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $126.85B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $39.19B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWAI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than WAI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WAI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MSCI and WAI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +7.09% price change this week, while WAI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +8.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.58%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.66% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.39% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($46.9B) has a higher market cap than WAI($4.74M). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than WAI: MSCI (35.99) vs WAI (0.03). MSCI YTD gains are higher at: 10.686 vs. WAI (-5.634). MSCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. WAI (-4.07M). WAI has less debt than MSCI: WAI (2.59M) vs MSCI (6.55B). MSCI has higher revenues than WAI: MSCI (3.24B) vs WAI (3.75M).
MSCIWAIMSCI / WAI
Capitalization46.9B4.74M989,869%
EBITDA2B-4.07M-49,293%
Gain YTD10.686-5.634-190%
P/E Ratio35.990.03105,418%
Revenue3.24B3.75M86,373%
Total CashN/A2.81M-
Total Debt6.55B2.59M252,623%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCI: Fundamental Ratings
MSCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCIWAI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REZI31.060.41
+1.34%
Resideo Technologies
SBGI14.00-0.14
-0.99%
Sinclair
LCUT9.16-0.18
-1.93%
Lifetime Brands
ADSK236.66-11.50
-4.63%
Autodesk
CTXR0.60-0.03
-4.84%
Citius Pharmaceuticals Inc

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-2.11%
SPGI - MSCI
67%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
MCO - MSCI
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
NDAQ - MSCI
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.28%
MORN - MSCI
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.27%
JEF - MSCI
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More

WAI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WAI and AUC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WAI and AUC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAI
1D Price
Change %
WAI100%
N/A
AUC - WAI
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
HUT - WAI
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
SIEB - WAI
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
HIVE - WAI
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
MSCI - WAI
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More