Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCMX vs RGAHX
MSCMX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MSCMX vs RGAHX
MSCMX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCMX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCMX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MSCMX (1.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MSCMX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MSCMX (0.00). MSCMX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MSCMX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MSCMX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCMX: RGAHX (250) vs MSCMX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. MSCMX (-8.26). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. MSCMX (-70.01).
| MSCMX | RGAHX | MSCMX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.991 | 9.200 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | 0.18 | -4,601% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.46 | 43.47 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | -70.01 | 13.78 | -508% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.87 | 106.68 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement