Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCMX vs RGAHX
MSCMX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MSCMX vs RGAHX
MSCMX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCMX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCMX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSCMX (1.18B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MSCMX: RGAHX (0.39) vs MSCMX (0.00). MSCMX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MSCMX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MSCMX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCMX: RGAHX (250) vs MSCMX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. MSCMX (2.94). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. MSCMX (-69.26).
| MSCMX | RGAHX | MSCMX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.138 | 6.676 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 8.63 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.72 | 45.32 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | -69.26 | 18.83 | -368% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.58 | 109.21 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement