MSDL
Price
$18.50
Change
+$0.37 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
26 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$14.64
Change
+$0.15 (+1.04%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
837.41M
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MSDL vs SLRC

Header iconMSDL vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts MSDL vs SLRCBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$18.50
Change+$0.37 (+2.04%)
Volume$562.63K
Capitalization1.92B
SLR Investment
Price$14.64
Change+$0.15 (+1.04%)
Volume$254.22K
Capitalization837.41M
MSDL vs SLRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSDL vs. SLRC commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSDL is a Hold and SLRC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MSDL: $18.50 vs. SLRC: $14.64)
Brand notoriety: MSDL and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSDL: 80% vs. SLRC: 113%
Market capitalization -- MSDL: $1.92B vs. SLRC: $837.41M
MSDL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.92B. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSDL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSDL is a better buy in the long-term than SLRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSDL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLRC is a better buy in the short-term than MSDL.

Price Growth

MSDL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSDL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.84% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.92B) has a higher market cap than SLRC($837M). SLRC has higher P/E ratio than MSDL: SLRC (10.84) vs MSDL (8.24). SLRC YTD gains are higher at: -7.152 vs. MSDL (-8.235). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 88.1M vs. SLRC (11.9M). SLRC has less debt than MSDL: SLRC (1.18B) vs MSDL (1.5B). MSDL has higher revenues than SLRC: MSDL (257M) vs SLRC (86.5M).
MSDLSLRCMSDL / SLRC
Capitalization1.92B837M229%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.235-7.152115%
P/E Ratio8.2410.8476%
Revenue257M86.5M297%
Total Cash88.1M11.9M740%
Total Debt1.5B1.18B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSDLSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWGFX10.600.24
+2.32%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc F1
PJIZX7.57N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq Z
BCSAX8.40N/A
N/A
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Inv A
STESX12.76N/A
N/A
Bernstein International Strat Eqs SCB
SHDYX7.92N/A
N/A
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq Y

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
+2.04%
BCSF - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CSWC - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
ARCC - MSDL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
SLRC - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
FSK - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
+1.00%
ARCC - SLRC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
FDUS - SLRC
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
CSWC - SLRC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
MFIC - SLRC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
NMFC - SLRC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More