MSFT vs SAPGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFT is a StrongSell and SAPGF is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MSFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SAPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MSFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAPGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MSFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.78% price change this week, while SAPGF (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MSFT | SAPGF | MSFT / SAPGF | |
| Capitalization | 3.16T | 160B | 1,972% |
| EBITDA | 121B | 6.57B | 1,841% |
| Gain YTD | 10.964 | 49.256 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.39 | 81.97 | 47% |
| Revenue | 228B | 31.9B | 715% |
| Total Cash | 81B | 14.6B | 555% |
| Total Debt | 88.4B | 12.2B | 725% |
MSFT | SAPGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSFT's Valuation (65) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAPGF (71) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAPGF (30) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's SMR Rating (27) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAPGF (77) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.
SAPGF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MSFT (54) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SAPGF’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAPGF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSFT (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SAPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
| MSFT | SAPGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 30% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 5 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
MSFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFT has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSFT jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 100% | -2.79% | ||
| SNPS - MSFT | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| CDNS - MSFT | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| COIN - MSFT | 56% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
| CLSK - MSFT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| RIOT - MSFT | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
More | ||||
SAPGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAPGF has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAPGF jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAPGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAPGF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| SAP - SAPGF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| MDB - SAPGF | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| MSFT - SAPGF | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| PDFS - SAPGF | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| CDNS - SAPGF | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
More | ||||