Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGCX vs NRGSX
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGCX vs NRGSX
Meridian Small Cap Growth C
Price$11.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.26M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.86B
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.86B vs. MSGCX (358M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGCX: NRGSX (0.06) vs MSGCX (0.00). MSGCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGCX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGCX: NRGSX (0) vs MSGCX (2500). MSGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.07 vs. NRGSX (-6.97). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.89 vs. MSGCX (-27.15).
| MSGCX | NRGSX | MSGCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.74 | 305% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.74 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.307 | -3.060 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 8.86B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.07 | -6.97 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.32 | 9.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.15 | 4.89 | -556% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.12 | 12.79 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement