Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGCX vs NRGSX
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGCX vs NRGSX
Meridian Small Cap Growth C
Price$10.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.18M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. MSGCX (320M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs MSGCX (0.00). MSGCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGCX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGCX: NRGSX (0) vs MSGCX (2500). MSGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.96 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -10.73 vs. MSGCX (-38.14).
| MSGCX | NRGSX | MSGCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.74 | 305% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.74 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.137 | -7.544 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320M | 8.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.96 | -14.54 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.48 | -4.05 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.14 | -10.73 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.33 | 3.75 | -222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement