Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGCX vs NRGSX
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGCX vs NRGSX
MSGCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGCX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. MSGCX (328M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGCX: NRGSX (0.47) vs MSGCX (0.00). MSGCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGCX (11 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGCX: NRGSX (0) vs MSGCX (2500). MSGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. NRGSX (-5.52). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -22.80 vs. MSGCX (-48.21).
| MSGCX | NRGSX | MSGCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.74 | 305% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.74 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.280 | 6.643 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 7.32B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -5.52 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.20 | -0.31 | -1,693% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.21 | -22.80 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.38 | 7.98 | -105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers