Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGFX vs RWIAX
MSGFX vs RWIAX Comparison
Open Charts MSGFX vs RWIAX
MSGFX vs RWIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGFX vs. RWIAX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGFX is a Buy and RWIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSGFX (1.04B). RWIAX pays higher dividends than MSGFX: RWIAX (0.70) vs MSGFX (0.00). MSGFX was incepted earlier than RWIAX: MSGFX (11 years) vs RWIAX (24 years). MSGFX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWIAX (1.51). RWIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSGFX (35.00). RWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGFX: RWIAX (250) vs MSGFX (1000). RWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.74 vs. MSGFX (-25.50). RWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.40 vs. MSGFX (-24.19).
| MSGFX | RWIAX | MSGFX / RWIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.51 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.51 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.822 | 13.768 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.50 | 14.74 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.93 | 44.85 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.19 | 28.40 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.11 | 92.69 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement