Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGFX vs RWIAX
MSGFX vs RWIAX Comparison
Open Charts MSGFX vs RWIAX
MSGFX vs RWIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGFX vs. RWIAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGFX is a Hold and RWIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSGFX (1.2B). RWIAX pays higher dividends than MSGFX: RWIAX (0.73) vs MSGFX (0.00). MSGFX was incepted earlier than RWIAX: MSGFX (11 years) vs RWIAX (24 years). MSGFX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWIAX (1.51). RWIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSGFX (35.00). RWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGFX: RWIAX (250) vs MSGFX (1000). RWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.93 vs. MSGFX (-27.08). RWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.99 vs. MSGFX (-23.62).
| MSGFX | RWIAX | MSGFX / RWIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.51 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.51 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.645 | 13.249 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.08 | 16.93 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.88 | 45.52 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.62 | 27.99 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.83 | 95.38 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers