Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.5B vs. MSGZX (715M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGZX: NRGSX (0.47) vs MSGZX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGZX (16 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). MSGZX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.32 vs. NRGSX (-3.29). MSGZX return over 5 years is better than : -6.04 vs. NRGSX (-18.86).
| MSGZX | NRGSX | MSGZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.728 | 9.955 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 715M | 7.5B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.32 | -3.29 | -708% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.23 | -0.83 | -4,961% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.04 | -18.86 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.88 | 11.87 | 505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement