Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. MSGZX (719M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGZX: NRGSX (0.44) vs MSGZX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGZX (16 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). MSGZX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. NRGSX (-5.23). MSGZX return over 5 years is better than : -6.78 vs. NRGSX (-19.58).
| MSGZX | NRGSX | MSGZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.609 | 12.002 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 719M | 7.51B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | -5.23 | -350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.16 | -1.53 | -2,295% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.78 | -19.58 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.93 | 11.10 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers