Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHLX vs RGAHX
MSHLX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MSHLX vs RGAHX
MSHLX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHLX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHLX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MSHLX (3.56B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MSHLX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MSHLX (0.00). MSHLX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MSHLX (14 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MSHLX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MSHLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHLX: RGAHX (250) vs MSHLX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. MSHLX (4.17). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. MSHLX (-39.03).
| MSHLX | RGAHX | MSHLX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.44 | 318% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.44 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.053 | 7.244 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 4.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.70 | 39.88 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.03 | 16.49 | -237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.99 | 102.84 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement