Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSHMX (3.84M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHMX (0.56) vs RGACX (0.00). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHMX (6.28) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. MSHMX (-10.76). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.37 vs. MSHMX (-11.70).
| MSHMX | RGACX | MSHMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.28 | 0.93 | 675% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.762 | 7.695 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.76 | 5.42 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.12 | 41.34 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.70 | 13.37 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers