Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSHMX (3.71M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHMX (0.54) vs RGACX (0.00). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHMX (6.28) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. MSHMX (-10.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. MSHMX (-11.86).
| MSHMX | RGACX | MSHMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.28 | 0.93 | 675% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.459 | 6.443 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.30 | 7.86 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.13 | 42.49 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.86 | 15.76 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers