Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGAGX
MSHMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGAGX
MSHMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSHMX (3.84M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGAGX: MSHMX (0.56) vs RGAGX (0.51). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MSHMX (6.28) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGAGX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. MSHMX (-10.76). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. MSHMX (-11.70).
| MSHMX | RGAGX | MSHMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.29 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.28 | 0.29 | 2,166% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.762 | 8.055 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.76 | 6.50 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.12 | 45.31 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.70 | 17.64 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers