Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGABX
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGABX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$15.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.58
Change+$0.30 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MSHNX (5.58M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: MSHNX (1.94) vs RGABX (0.00). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MSHNX (5 years) vs RGABX (23 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGABX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. MSHNX (10.38). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. MSHNX (15.33).
| MSHNX | RGABX | MSHNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.39 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 1.39 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.254 | 16.802 | 121% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.58M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 10.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.51 | 66.66 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.33 | 39.53 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement