Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGABX
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGABX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$13.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$67.02
Change-$0.48 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.99B
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGABX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Sell and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 296B vs. MSHNX (5.05M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: MSHNX (2.27) vs RGABX (0.00). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MSHNX (5 years) vs RGABX (23 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGABX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). MSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. RGABX (4.52). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 38.10 vs. MSHNX (20.01).
| MSHNX | RGABX | MSHNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.39 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 1.39 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.849 | 0.903 | 1,090% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.05M | 296B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 4.52 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 36.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.01 | 38.10 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement