Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGACX
MSHNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$15.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
MSHNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MSHNX (5.72M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHNX (1.94) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHNX (6 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGACX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. MSHNX (9.29). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. MSHNX (7.76).
| MSHNX | RGACX | MSHNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.94 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 0.94 | 846% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.175 | 17.655 | 114% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.72M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.07 | 2,802% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 11.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 70.57 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.76 | 37.85 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.78 | - |