Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGAGX
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGAGX
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MSHOX (3.83M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MSHOX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MSHOX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MSHOX (13.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGAGX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. MSHOX (-11.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. MSHOX (-18.82).
| MSHOX | RGAGX | MSHOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.29 | 672% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.08 | 0.29 | 4,510% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.156 | 7.335 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 4.75 | -243% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.15 | 41.00 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.82 | 17.74 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement