MSIF
Price
$15.17
Change
-$1.05 (-6.47%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
298.94M
RAND
Price
$18.94
Change
-$0.35 (-1.81%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.62M
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MSIF vs RAND

Header iconMSIF vs RAND Comparison
Open Charts MSIF vs RANDBanner chart's image
MSC Income Fund
Price$15.17
Change-$1.05 (-6.47%)
Volume$554
Capitalization298.94M
Rand Capital
Price$18.94
Change-$0.35 (-1.81%)
Volume$740
Capitalization35.62M
MSIF vs RAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSIF vs. RAND commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSIF is a Hold and RAND is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MSIF: $16.22 vs. RAND: $19.29)
Brand notoriety: MSIF and RAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSIF: 43% vs. RAND: 18%
Market capitalization -- MSIF: $298.94M vs. RAND: $35.62M
MSIF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $298.94M. RAND’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $35.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRAND’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RAND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RAND is a better buy in the long-term than MSIF.

Price Growth

MSIF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.59% price change this week, while RAND (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

RAND is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSIF($299M) has a higher market cap than RAND($35.6M). RAND has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: RAND (5.45) vs MSIF (3.36). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: 41.469 vs. RAND (1.404). RAND has less debt than MSIF: RAND (16.2M) vs MSIF (473M). MSIF has higher revenues than RAND: MSIF (53.2M) vs RAND (9.26M).
MSIFRANDMSIF / RAND
Capitalization299M35.6M840%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.4691.4042,953%
P/E Ratio3.365.4562%
Revenue53.2M9.26M575%
Total CashN/A3.48M-
Total Debt473M16.2M2,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RAND: Fundamental Ratings
RAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTMRX17.04N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R
LGLRX40.05N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
EKWDX75.64N/A
N/A
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
REAYX23.56N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Equity Income Y
FAPKX12.43N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future C

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSIF and PWM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSIF and PWM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
-1.04%
PWM - MSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
RAND - MSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
TPVG - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
HRZN - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
SCM - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More