MSIF
Price
$16.53
Change
+$0.21 (+1.29%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
298.94M
RAND
Price
$16.20
Change
-$0.08 (-0.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSIF vs RAND

Header iconMSIF vs RAND Comparison
Open Charts MSIF vs RANDBanner chart's image
MSC Income Fund
Price$16.53
Change+$0.21 (+1.29%)
Volume$73.53K
Capitalization298.94M
Rand Capital
Price$16.20
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
Volume$3.74K
Capitalization35.62M
MSIF vs RAND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSIF vs. RAND commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSIF is a Hold and RAND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MSIF: $16.53 vs. RAND: $16.20)
Brand notoriety: MSIF and RAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSIF: 106% vs. RAND: 68%
Market capitalization -- MSIF: $298.94M vs. RAND: $35.62M
MSIF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $298.94M. RAND’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $35.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSIF is a better buy in the long-term than RAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RAND is a better buy in the short-term than MSIF.

Price Growth

MSIF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while RAND (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSIF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

RAND is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSIF($299M) has a higher market cap than RAND($35.6M). RAND has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: RAND (5.45) vs MSIF (3.36). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: 44.173 vs. RAND (-13.314). RAND has less debt than MSIF: RAND (16.2M) vs MSIF (473M). MSIF has higher revenues than RAND: MSIF (53.2M) vs RAND (9.26M).
MSIFRANDMSIF / RAND
Capitalization299M35.6M840%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.173-13.314-332%
P/E Ratio3.365.4562%
Revenue53.2M9.26M575%
Total CashN/A3.48M-
Total Debt473M16.2M2,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RAND: Fundamental Ratings
RAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSIFRAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNPS548.7425.63
+4.90%
Synopsys
LNKB7.670.14
+1.86%
LINKBANCORP
TISI18.880.03
+0.16%
Team
ALEX18.01N/A
N/A
Alexander & Baldwin
R171.57-0.02
-0.01%
Ryder System

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSIF and PWM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSIF and PWM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
+1.29%
PWM - MSIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.38%
TPVG - MSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAND - MSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
PSEC - MSIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCM - MSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More