Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSJCX vs RSLAX
MSJCX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts MSJCX vs RSLAX
MSJCX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSJCX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSJCX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. MSJCX (15M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than MSJCX: RSLAX (0.17) vs MSJCX (0.00). MSJCX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: MSJCX (8 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). MSJCX (3.20) is less costly to investors than RSLAX (1.74). MSJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSJCX: RSLAX (250) vs MSJCX (1000). MSJCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. RSLAX (7.36). RSLAX return over 5 years is better than : -14.43 vs. MSJCX (-37.09).
| MSJCX | RSLAX | MSJCX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.20 | 1.74 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.267 | 11.723 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 7.36 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.25 | 33.50 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.09 | -14.43 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement