Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSPRX vs RGACX
MSPRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSPRX vs RGACX
MSPRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSPRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSPRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSPRX (231M). MSPRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MSPRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSPRX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSPRX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSPRX: RGACX (250) vs MSPRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. MSPRX (-4.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. MSPRX (-47.73).
| MSPRX | RGACX | MSPRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.93 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.93 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.692 | 6.185 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.22 | 7.94 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.03 | 43.05 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.73 | 13.23 | -361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.09 | 107.97 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement