Advertisement
MT vs SID
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ArcelorMittal (MT) has delivered superior year-to-date returns of 30.07% compared to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional's (SID) 20.86%, reflecting stronger momentum in recent market activity.
- MT boasts a market cap of $44.9 billion and positive EPS of $4.11, contrasting with SID's $1.7 billion cap and negative EPS of -$0.30.
- Both stocks operate in the cyclical steel sector but MT benefits from global diversification while SID leverages Brazil-focused multi-segment operations including mining and logistics.
- SID offers a high forward dividend yield of 14.52%, appealing to income-focused investors, versus MT's 1.02%.
- Recent developments like MT's sustainability report and consensus updates signal positive sentiment shifts for the larger peer.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MT and SID, two NYSE-listed companies in the steel and metals sector, amid fluctuating commodity prices and global demand dynamics. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing value in cyclical industries may find insights here on relative performance, risk profiles, and market positioning. With steel production tied to infrastructure, automotive, and construction trends, understanding their recent trajectories helps evaluate trade-offs in growth potential versus stability in the current environment.
MT Overview and Recent Performance
ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) is the world's leading integrated steel and mining company, operating across the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Africa. It produces flat and long steel products, pipes, and mining outputs like iron ore and coking coal, serving automotive, construction, and energy sectors. In recent weeks, MT shares have traded around $59, near the upper end of their 52-week range of $28.01–$67.60, with year-to-date gains of 30.07% and one-year returns exceeding 100%. Sentiment has been buoyed by the release of its 2025 Sustainability Report emphasizing safer growth, first-quarter 2026 analyst consensus figures, and resilience amid geopolitical steel discussions, despite challenges like Ukraine operations. Trading at a PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 14.36 with a beta of 1.71, it reflects solid profitability amid sector volatility.
SID Overview and Recent Performance
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID), or CSN, is a Brazil-based integrated producer spanning steel, mining, logistics, cement, and energy. Its steel segment focuses on flat and long products, complemented by iron ore mining and port operations. Recently, SID shares have hovered near $1.29, toward the lower half of their 52-week range of $1.11–$2.20, posting year-to-date returns of 20.86% and one-year gains of 23.21%. Performance reflects broader pressures on Brazilian industrials, offset by debt refinancing efforts securing up to $1.4 billion in credit. With a high beta of 1.52 and negative EPS, sentiment ties to commodity cycles and domestic economic factors, though its diversified revenue streams provide some buffer.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and more. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—factoring in volatility levels (low, medium, high), timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts, and strategies blending technical and fundamental analysis—earn a spot among the featured 25. These bots vary widely in style, from momentum scalpers to trend-followers, offering stats on performance tailored to current environments. Traders can explore and copy these for automated execution. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots potentially suited to steel sector plays like MT and SID.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ArcelorMittal (MT) and Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) both navigate steel sector cyclicality but diverge in scale and scope. MT's global footprint and mining integration drive growth via diversified demand, contrasting SID's Brazil-centric model with logistics and energy adding revenue stability. Recent momentum favors MT, with triple-digit one-year returns versus SID's modest gains, amid stronger profitability (5.14% profit margin vs. -4.47%). Risk factors include high betas for both, but SID's elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 343% heightens vulnerability to interest rates and currency swings. Sector exposure overlaps in iron ore and steel, yet MT garners more positive market sentiment from sustainability and consensus updates.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI tools would currently lean toward MT based on superior trend consistency, year-to-date outperformance, positive earnings trajectory, and global positioning amid steel recovery signals. While SID presents value via high yield and diversification, its weaker momentum and profitability tilt probabilities in MT's favor for near-term relative strength.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MT is a StrongBuy and SID is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSID’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SID’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SID’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MT (@Steel) experienced а +5.36% price change this week, while SID (@Steel) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +179.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +134.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
MT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SID is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Steel (+179.67% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
| MT | SID | MT / SID | |
| Capitalization | 53.3B | 1.57B | 3,399% |
| EBITDA | 3.99B | 6.48B | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 56.127 | -23.750 | -236% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.54 | 898.88 | 2% |
| Revenue | 62B | 44.5B | 139% |
| Total Cash | 4.36B | 13.4B | 33% |
| Total Debt | 13.7B | 51.5B | 27% |
MT | SID | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SID's Valuation (14) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (22). This means that SID’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.
MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for SID (100). This means that MT’s stock grew significantly faster than SID’s over the last 12 months.
MT's SMR Rating (95) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SID (96). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to SID’s over the last 12 months.
MT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SID (62). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to SID’s over the last 12 months.
SID's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (58). This means that SID’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.
| MT | SID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITDI | 41.78 | 0.19 | +0.46% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF | |||
| UMAR | 41.99 | 0.13 | +0.30% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar | |||
| NLSI | 50.70 | N/A | N/A |
| NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF | |||
| MYCH | 24.87 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| State Street® My2028 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| SH | 33.57 | -0.17 | -0.50% |
| ProShares Short S&P500 | |||
MT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with TX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then TX could also see price increases.
SID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SID has been loosely correlated with GGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SID jumps, then GGB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SID | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| GGB - SID | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| MT - SID | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| TX - SID | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| ASTL - SID | 47% Loosely correlated | +6.37% | ||
| MTUS - SID | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||