Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTCAX vs SLMCX
MTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts MTCAX vs SLMCX
MTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTCAX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTCAX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. MTCAX (2.41B). MTCAX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . MTCAX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: MTCAX (30 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) and MTCAX (1.12) have similar cost to investors . MTCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). MTCAX (6%) and SLMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MTCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: MTCAX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 81.82 vs. MTCAX (13.63). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 89.45 vs. MTCAX (0.22).
| MTCAX | SLMCX | MTCAX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.16 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.16 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.434 | 52.827 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 28.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.63 | 81.82 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.83 | 120.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.22 | 89.45 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.74 | 320.14 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement