MTG
Price
$23.79
Change
+$0.17 (+0.72%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.01B
52 days until earnings call
TRRSF
Price
$22.93
Change
-$0.56 (-2.38%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
Ad is loading...

MTG vs TRRSF

Header iconMTG vs TRRSF Comparison
Open Charts MTG vs TRRSFBanner chart's image
MGIC Investment
Price$23.79
Change+$0.17 (+0.72%)
Volume$2.02M
Capitalization6.01B
Trisura Group
Price$22.93
Change-$0.56 (-2.38%)
Volume$14.77K
Capitalization1.17B
MTG vs TRRSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTG vs. TRRSF commentary
Mar 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTG is a StrongBuy and TRRSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MTG: $23.79 vs. TRRSF: $22.93)
Brand notoriety: MTG and TRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTG: 117% vs. TRRSF: 410%
Market capitalization -- MTG: $6.01B vs. TRRSF: $1.17B
MTG [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.01B. TRRSF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRRSF is a better buy in the long-term than MTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MTG (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -3.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTG is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-1.38% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTG($6.01B) has a higher market cap than TRRSF($1.17B). TRRSF has higher P/E ratio than MTG: TRRSF (112.36) vs MTG (8.79). MTG YTD gains are higher at: 0.868 vs. TRRSF (-15.946). MTG has more cash in the bank: 6.09B vs. TRRSF (368M). TRRSF has less debt than MTG: TRRSF (86.2M) vs MTG (643M). MTG has higher revenues than TRRSF: MTG (1.16B) vs TRRSF (707M).
MTGTRRSFMTG / TRRSF
Capitalization6.01B1.17B515%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.868-15.946-5%
P/E Ratio8.79112.368%
Revenue1.16B707M163%
Total Cash6.09B368M1,654%
Total Debt643M86.2M746%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTG vs TRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
MTG
TRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2239
SMR RATING
1..100
7452
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTG's Valuation (79) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (85) in the null industry. This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (39) in the null industry. This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MTG (74) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that TRRSF’s stock grew similarly to MTG’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (63) in the null industry. This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as TRRSF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEEBX15.270.19
+1.26%
JHancock Infrastructure A
HFQCX6.500.08
+1.25%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C
GEMHX11.670.05
+0.43%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn A
IOAPX26.440.08
+0.30%
Invesco Main Street All Cap R6
FRSLX23.66-0.04
-0.17%
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A

TRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and RDN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and RDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRSF
1D Price
Change %
TRRSF100%
-2.38%
RDN - TRRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
ESNT - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
FNF - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
TIPT - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
MTG - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More