Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTRCX vs RLBFX
MTRCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MTRCX vs RLBFX
MTRCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTRCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTRCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. MTRCX (7.57B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MTRCX: RLBFX (2.05) vs MTRCX (1.62). MTRCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MTRCX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MTRCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRCX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRCX: RLBFX (250) vs MTRCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. MTRCX (5.08). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. MTRCX (-1.50).
| MTRCX | RLBFX | MTRCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.110 | 10.287 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.57B | 283B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 12.94 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 46.32 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.50 | 35.73 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.72 | 86.86 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers