Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTRCX vs RLBFX
MTRCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MTRCX vs RLBFX
MTRCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTRCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTRCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MTRCX (7.46B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MTRCX: RLBFX (2.03) vs MTRCX (1.66). MTRCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MTRCX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MTRCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRCX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRCX: RLBFX (250) vs MTRCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. MTRCX (2.89). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. MTRCX (-3.60).
| MTRCX | RLBFX | MTRCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.455 | 8.732 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.46B | 288B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 12.40 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.85 | 40.94 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | 34.75 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.31 | 85.40 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers