MasTec (MTZ) and MYR Group (MYRG) are key players in the infrastructure construction sector, specializing in energy, utilities, and communications projects amid rising demand for electrification, renewables, and data centers. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, backlogs, and market positioning to aid traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term growth in U.S. infrastructure spending. With both delivering outsized returns in recent market activity, the analysis highlights contrasts in scale, diversification, and valuation for informed relative performance decisions.
MasTec (MTZ), headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, is a diversified infrastructure engineering and construction firm operating across communications, clean energy, power delivery, pipeline, and other segments. The company builds wireless networks, renewable power generation, transmission systems, and pipelines for utilities, energy providers, and government entities.
In recent weeks, MTZ reported record Q1 results with revenue surging 34% year-over-year to $3.83 billion, adjusted EBITDA up 73% to $284 million, and a backlog reaching $20.3 billion—a new high driven by clean energy and communications demand. The stock has delivered over 100% YTD returns and 200% over one year, trading around $437 with a ~$34 billion market cap. Sentiment has shifted positively on raised 2026 guidance for $17.5 billion revenue (22% growth) and analyst price target hikes, fueled by data center expansions and grid modernization projects.
MYR Group (MYRG), based in Thornton, Colorado, provides electrical construction services through Transmission & Distribution (T&D) and Commercial & Industrial (C&I) segments. It focuses on high-voltage transmission lines, substations, EV charging, and wiring for data centers, renewables, and utilities.
Recent market activity saw MYRG post record Q1 revenue of $1 billion (up 20%), net income doubling to $47 million, and gross margins expanding to 13.4% from better project mix and productivity. Backlog hit $2.84 billion, with the stock surging over 110% YTD and 200% annually, near $469 and a $7.3 billion market cap. Positive sentiment stems from electrification trends, debt reduction, and raised outlook, though higher volatility reflects smaller scale.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 advanced agents, scanning thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—those with proven edge in momentum, sector rotation, and trend-following—earn a spot in this dynamic showcase. Featured bots deliver impressive stats like annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors exceeding 11x, spanning timeframes from 5-minute to daily signals. Strategies vary from multi-agent systems with 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors to AI/ML models targeting semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AVGO), industrials, data centers, and leveraged ETFs. Traders can copy these high performers directly via Tickeron’s brokerage integration for real-time execution. Explore the Trending AI Robots to leverage AI-driven insights tailored to today’s market.
MasTec (MTZ) and MYR Group (MYRG) both thrive in infrastructure but differ in business models: MTZ offers broader exposure via five segments including pipelines and clean energy generation, while MYRG specializes in electrical T&D (high-voltage grids) and C&I (data centers, EV infrastructure).
Growth drivers align on electrification and renewables, but MTZ’s $20.3B backlog dwarfs MYRG’s $2.84B, signaling superior revenue visibility. Recent momentum favors both with triple-digit YTD gains, though MYRG shows sharper short-term surges post-earnings.
Risk factors include project delays and labor shortages; MTZ’s beta (~1.8) indicates higher volatility than MYRG (~1.3). Sector exposure overlaps in utilities but MTZ adds telecom/pipelines. Market sentiment leans bullish for both amid analyst upgrades, with MTZ at elevated P/E (~75x) vs. MYRG (~52x), trading off scale for specialization.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MasTec (MTZ) due to its unmatched backlog scale, multi-segment trend consistency, and catalysts like data center wins and raised guidance. While MYRG excels in electrical margins and agility, MTZ’s relative positioning offers higher probability of sustained outperformance in the infrastructure upcycle, albeit with greater volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMYRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYRG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -8.49% price change this week, while MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.59%.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MTZ | MYRG | MTZ / MYRG | |
| Capitalization | 30.4B | 6.86B | 443% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | 266M | 457% |
| Gain YTD | 77.117 | 101.684 | 76% |
| P/E Ratio | 67.43 | 48.59 | 139% |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 3.83B | 400% |
| Total Cash | 274M | 163M | 168% |
| Total Debt | 3.02B | 61.5M | 4,911% |
MTZ | MYRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (85) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (90). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (7). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's SMR Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (58). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MYRG (84). This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MTZ | MYRG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| DY - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MTZ - MYRG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| IESC - MYRG | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
More | ||||