MULN
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
34.07M
TSLA
Price
$319.04
Change
-$2.16 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jul 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
559.85B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MULN vs TSLA

Header iconMULN vs TSLA Comparison
Open Charts MULN vs TSLABanner chart's image
Mullen Automotive
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$226.15M
Capitalization34.07M
Tesla
Price$319.04
Change-$2.16 (-0.67%)
Volume$771.22K
Capitalization559.85B
MULN vs TSLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MULN vs. TSLA commentary
Jul 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MULN is a StrongBuy and TSLA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2025
Stock price -- (MULN: $0.07 vs. TSLA: $321.20)
Brand notoriety: MULN: Not notable vs. TSLA: Notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MULN: 357% vs. TSLA: 79%
Market capitalization -- MULN: $34.07M vs. TSLA: $559.85B
MULN [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $34.07M. TSLA’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $559.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MULN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSLA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLA is a better buy in the long-term than MULN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MULN’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MULN’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TSLA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSLA is a better buy in the short-term than MULN.

Price Growth

MULN (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -15.38% price change this week, while TSLA (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -3.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

MULN is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

TSLA is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.58% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLA($560B) has a higher market cap than MULN($34.1M). TSLA has higher P/E ratio than MULN: TSLA (40.73) vs MULN (0.00). TSLA YTD gains are higher at: -20.464 vs. MULN (-100.000). TSLA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. MULN (-686.05M). TSLA has more cash in the bank: 29.1B vs. MULN (81.5M). MULN has less debt than TSLA: MULN (19M) vs TSLA (9.57B). TSLA has higher revenues than MULN: TSLA (96.8B) vs MULN (366K).
MULNTSLAMULN / TSLA
Capitalization34.1M560B0%
EBITDA-686.05M14.8B-5%
Gain YTD-100.000-20.464489%
P/E Ratio0.0040.730%
Revenue366K96.8B0%
Total Cash81.5M29.1B0%
Total Debt19M9.57B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BINI vs TSLA: Fundamental Ratings
BINI
TSLA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
10074
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BINI's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSLA (96) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BINI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSLA’s over the last 12 months.

TSLA's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BINI (100) in the null industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BINI’s over the last 12 months.

TSLA's SMR Rating (74) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BINI (100) in the null industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew similarly to BINI’s over the last 12 months.

TSLA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BINI (99) in the null industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BINI’s over the last 12 months.

TSLA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Motor Vehicles industry is significantly better than the same rating for BINI (100) in the null industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew significantly faster than BINI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BINITSLA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DURA33.620.01
+0.02%
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF
COWZ56.91-0.22
-0.39%
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
WDI14.88-0.08
-0.53%
Western Asset Diversified Income Fund
TOGA34.71-0.41
-1.17%
Tremblant Global ETF
EDEN109.62-6.43
-5.54%
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF