Ad is loading...
MVCAX vs NBMRX
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBMRX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$23.34
Change+$0.53 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.16M
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBMRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. NBMRX (46.2M). MVCAX (0.90) and NBMRX (0.87) have matching dividends . MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: NBMRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.95 vs. NBMRX (-11.10). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 77.73 vs. MVCAX (59.24).
| MVCAX | NBMRX | MVCAX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.72 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.149 | -13.072 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.8B | 46.2M | 34,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.95 | -11.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.00 | -7.41 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.24 | 77.73 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...