Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBMRX
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBMRX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$25.15
Change+$0.15 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.66M
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. NBMRX (49.7M). MVCAX (0.89) and NBMRX (0.85) have matching dividends . MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: NBMRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX (-5.05) and NBMRX (-5.14) have marching annual gain over last year. NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.65 vs. MVCAX (40.08).
| MVCAX | NBMRX | MVCAX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.72 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.151 | -4.726 | 46% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 49.7M | 33,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.85 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.05 | -5.14 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.85 | 0.60 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 54.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement