Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBMRX
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBMRX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.08
Change+$0.09 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.32M
MVCAX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBMRX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. NBMRX (51.3M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: MVCAX (0.87) vs NBMRX (0.82). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: NBMRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.68 vs. MVCAX (-6.18). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 74.84 vs. MVCAX (50.84).
| MVCAX | NBMRX | MVCAX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.72 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.684 | -0.953 | -72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 51.3M | 32,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.18 | -5.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 18.62 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.84 | 74.84 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement