Ad is loading...
MVCAX vs NCBVX
MVCAX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NCBVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$19.28
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.7M
MVCAX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NCBVX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a StrongBuy and NCBVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. NCBVX (159M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: NCBVX (1.02) vs MVCAX (0.87). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (1000) and NCBVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.23 vs. MVCAX (-7.24). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 144.95 vs. MVCAX (92.08).
| MVCAX | NCBVX | MVCAX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.95 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.81 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.640 | -4.200 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.6B | 159M | 10,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.24 | -2.23 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.99 | 1.53 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.08 | 144.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.41 | 12.14 | 448% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...