Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs PCGRX
MVCAX vs PCGRX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs PCGRX
MVCAX vs PCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. PCGRX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Hold and PCGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. PCGRX (774M). PCGRX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: PCGRX (1.29) vs MVCAX (1.11). MVCAX was incepted earlier than PCGRX: MVCAX (25 years) vs PCGRX (36 years). PCGRX (1.11) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (0.98). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PCGRX (22.00). MVCAX (6%) and PCGRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCGRX: MVCAX (1000) vs PCGRX (2500). PCGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.48 vs. MVCAX (8.36). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.22 vs. PCGRX (9.42).
| MVCAX | PCGRX | MVCAX / PCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.11 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.11 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.502 | 17.404 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3B | 774M | 2,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 16.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 24.23 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.22 | 9.42 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.34 | 30.83 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement