Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWFAX vs RGWBX
MWFAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MWFAX vs RGWBX
MWFAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWFAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWFAX is a StrongBuy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. MWFAX (166M). MWFAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MWFAX (1.04) vs RGWBX (0.00). MWFAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MWFAX (6 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than MWFAX (0.82). MWFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWFAX: RGWBX (250) vs MWFAX (2500). MWFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.20 vs. RGWBX (19.41). MWFAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.47 vs. RGWBX (24.16).
| MWFAX | RGWBX | MWFAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.46 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.46 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.254 | 10.958 | 121% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 19.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.74 | 54.58 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.47 | 24.16 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement