Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWOFX vs NPFFX
MWOFX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MWOFX vs NPFFX
MWOFX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWOFX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWOFX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MWOFX (813M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MWOFX (0.12). MWOFX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MWOFX (33 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MWOFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX (23.00) and MWOFX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: NPFFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.39 vs. MWOFX (-4.76). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.14 vs. MWOFX (-4.90).
| MWOFX | NPFFX | MWOFX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.77 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.77 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.285 | 5.301 | -43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.92 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | 7.39 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.78 | 34.25 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.90 | 13.14 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.44 | 108.19 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers