MXC
Price
$11.49
Change
-$0.12 (-1.03%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
20.93M
PR
Price
$14.03
Change
-$0.60 (-4.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.28B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MXC vs PR

Header iconMXC vs PR Comparison
Open Charts MXC vs PRBanner chart's image
Mexco Energy
Price$11.49
Change-$0.12 (-1.03%)
Volume$980
Capitalization20.93M
Permian Resources
Price$14.03
Change-$0.60 (-4.10%)
Volume$9.34M
Capitalization10.28B
MXC vs PR Comparison Chart
Loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MXC vs. PR commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXC is a Hold and PR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MXC: $11.49 vs. PR: $14.03)
Brand notoriety: MXC and PR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MXC: 6% vs. PR: 128%
Market capitalization -- MXC: $20.93M vs. PR: $10.28B
MXC [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $20.93M. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $10.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MXC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MXC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than MXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

MXC (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MXC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

PR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($10.3B) has a higher market cap than MXC($20.9M). PR has higher P/E ratio than MXC: PR (14.29) vs MXC (12.85). MXC YTD gains are higher at: 1.862 vs. PR (-2.434). PR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.2B vs. MXC (4.3M). PR has more cash in the bank: 73.3M vs. MXC (3.58M). MXC has less debt than PR: MXC (33.6K) vs PR (3.91B). PR has higher revenues than MXC: PR (3.12B) vs MXC (7.01M).
MXCPRMXC / PR
Capitalization20.9M10.3B0%
EBITDA4.3M2.2B0%
Gain YTD1.862-2.434-76%
P/E Ratio12.8514.2990%
Revenue7.01M3.12B0%
Total Cash3.58M73.3M5%
Total Debt33.6K3.91B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MXC vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
MXC
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6310
SMR RATING
1..100
7852
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5876
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1295
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PR's Valuation (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MXC (56). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to MXC’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXC (63). This means that PR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXC’s over the last 12 months.

PR's SMR Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MXC (78). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to MXC’s over the last 12 months.

MXC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (76). This means that MXC’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

MXC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for PR (95). This means that MXC’s stock grew significantly faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOVZ10.110.19
+1.97%
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF
BALT31.78-0.10
-0.33%
Innovator Defined Wealth Shld ETF
RNRG8.56-0.04
-0.47%
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
XLE90.93-1.93
-2.08%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF
DSMC33.64-0.79
-2.31%
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF

MXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXC has been loosely correlated with CEIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXC jumps, then CEIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXC
1D Price
Change %
MXC100%
-1.03%
CEIN - MXC
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
INDO - MXC
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
VTLE - MXC
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.93%
PR - MXC
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.10%
IMPP - MXC
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
More